home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sage3101-21.its.rpi.edu!gentrj
- From: gentrj@sage3101-21.its.rpi.edu (Ghost In The Machine)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- Followup-To: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Date: 23 Feb 1996 02:23:31 GMT
- Organization: its
- Message-ID: <4gj8f3$mr4@usenet.rpi.edu>
- References: <00001a73+00002504@msn.com> <3114d8fb.5a455349@zesi.ruhr.de> <4f5h5t$f13@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4g1bgf$l5@mailhub.scitec.com.au> <4g2vn3$rgi@dfw.dfw.net> <dewar.824687140@schonberg>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sage3101-21.its.rpi.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Robert Dewar (dewar@cs.nyu.edu) wrote:
- : Actually the source of this incorrect viewpoint often stems from lack
- : of familiarity with C++ (you can sort of guess this from anyone who
- : writes C/C++ as though it were one language). It is remarkable how many
- : people think they know C++ becaus they program in it, and yet they are
- : unaware of exceptions, namespaces and the standard template library.
- : And try seeing how many C++ programmers really understand the overloading
- : semantics in C++.
-
- Hmmm ... a professor at mine is one of the fine fellows who developed
- the standard template library. That right there would lead me to
- believe that he "understands" C++ by your estimation. He also seems
- to recognize the features of exceptions, namespaces, etc. Yet, he
- has been talking in class the past several classes about Ada95's
- advantages over C++. So, it would seem that not everyone who says
- that Ada95 is better then C++ simply "doesn't understand C++" ....
-
- --
- Jeff Gentry jester@rpi.edu
- PGP Public Key Available Upon Request
- http://www.rpi.edu/~gentrj
-